Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 15 de 15
Filter
1.
Asia Pac J Public Health ; 34(5): 565-568, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2310057

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has reduced opportunities for small talk. As small talk involves socializing, such deprivation can be stressful. This study examined the association between the change in the frequency of small talk from before to during the pandemic and the mental health of middle-aged and older people. We obtained data from web-based longitudinal surveys for members of a Japanese social networking service. People who felt their small talk frequency decreased during the pandemic compared with the prepandemic period had lower psychological well-being and greater loneliness than those who did not. Our study quantitatively revealed the importance of small talk during the pandemic in maintaining people's mental health.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Loneliness/psychology , Longitudinal Studies , Mental Health , Middle Aged
2.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 20(6)2023 03 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2263813

ABSTRACT

Survivors of the Kumamoto earthquake of 2016 experienced the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak while carrying additional burdens that might bring inadequate coping. This cross-sectional survey aimed to identify untreated and interrupted consultations among those with hypertension and related factors and to identify the disaster's long-term effects. Of the 19,212 earthquake survivors who had moved to permanent housing, 7367 (4196 women and 3171 men, mean age 61.8 ± 17.3 years) completed a self-administered questionnaire. The prevalence of hypertension was 41.4%. The results of the logistic regression analysis with the significant independent variables in the bivariate analysis were: reduced income due to COVID-19 (AOR = 3.23, 95%CI = 2.27-4.58) and poor self-rated health (AOR = 2.49, 95%CI = 1.72-3.61) were associated with a risk of untreated or discontinued treatment. Moreover, living in rental, public or restoration public housing was also significantly associated with a higher risk of hypertension noncompliance (AOR = 1.92, 95%CI = 1.20-3.07; AOR = 2.47, 95%CI = 1.38-4.42; AOR = 4.12, 95%CI = 1.14-14.90). These results suggest that changes due to COVID-19, the extent of self-rated health and the type of permanent housing influence the hypertension consulting behaviour of earthquake survivors during recovery. It is crucial to implement long-term public support for the mental health, income and housing concerns of the survivors.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Earthquakes , Hypertension , Male , Humans , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Pandemics , Cross-Sectional Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , Public Housing , Hypertension/epidemiology
3.
Front Public Health ; 11: 1094340, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2273302

ABSTRACT

Objective: The recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has changed people's social connections with others and society. This study aimed to describe changes in the prevalence of social isolation and loneliness by demographic characteristics, socioeconomic status, health conditions, and outbreak situations in residential prefectures among Japanese people between the first year (2020) and the second year (2021) of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We used data from the Japan COVID-19 and Society Internet Survey (JACSIS) study, a large-scale web-based nationwide survey conducted with 53,657 participants aged 15-79 years in August-September 2020 and September-October 2021 (25,482 and 28,175 participants, respectively). Social isolation was defined as less than once a week in the total frequency of contact with family members or relatives who were living apart and friends/neighbors. Loneliness was assessed using the three-item University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale (score range, 3-12). We used generalized estimating equations to estimate the prevalence of social isolation and loneliness in each year and the difference in prevalence between 2020 and 2021. Results: The weighted proportion (95% confidence interval) of social isolation in the total sample was 27.4% (25.9, 28.9) in 2020 and 22.7% (21.9, 23.5) in 2021, representing a change of -4.7 percentage points (-6.3, -3.1). The weighted mean scores of the UCLA Loneliness Scale were 5.03 (4.86, 5.20) in 2020 and 5.86 (5.81, 5.91) in 2021, representing a change of 0.83 points (0.66, 1.00). The detailed trend changes for social isolation and loneliness were noted in the demographic subgroups of socioeconomic status, health conditions, and outbreak situation in the residential prefecture. Conclusion: Social isolation decreased from the first to the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic, whereas loneliness increased. Assessing the COVID-19 pandemic's impact on social isolation and loneliness contributes to understanding who was particularly vulnerable during the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Loneliness , Humans , Pandemics , Japan , Prevalence , Social Isolation
4.
Byotai seiri ; 56:43770.0, 2022.
Article in Japanese | Ichushi | ID: covidwho-2243591
5.
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi ; 2022 Jun 30.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1912161

ABSTRACT

Objective This study aims to understand the status of the resident support activities of second-layer Seikatsu-shien coordinators, who assist in local residents' community development activities, based on long-term care. It observes the effects of these activities, and the presence or absence of relevant instructions from the government or affiliated institutions during and after a state of emergency, such as a lockdown situation. This was examined during the first state of emergency following the COVID-19 crisis, from April to May 2020.Method In October 2020, a self-administered questionnaire was distributed by mail to 279 second-layer Seikatsu-shien coordinators working in Tokyo's special wards, and 181 responses were collected. The survey focused on the coordinators' activities and activity frequency before the spread of COVID-19, during the state of emergency, and after the activities resumed. Furthermore, the survey questioned whether relevant instructions from the government or affiliated institutions were given during the state of emergency and after the activities resumed. Their details were confirmed in the free comments section.Activity In creating and revising regional diagnosis tables for the area covered, creating and distributing information magazines and leaflets, etc. included in "understanding social resources and providing information to relevant parties," activity frequency was significantly higher after activities resumed, than before the spread of infection. During the state of emergency, activity frequency was high in the affiliated institution, and only 3.4% of the coordinators visited and spoke to local residents; 91.1% of respondents received instructions from government and affiliated institutions during the state of emergency, and activity frequency was significantly higher when there were instructions; 76.5% received instructions after resuming activities, and activity frequency, such as understanding residents' needs through individual interviews and visits, matching them with services, and supporting the resumption of activity groups was significantly higher when instructions were provided.Conclusion  After resuming activities, understanding the value of social resources and providing information to the relevant parties was prioritized. During the state of emergency, almost no visits or calls were made to local residents. The frequency of activities to reach out to residents was higher in the presence of instructions, especially after activities resumed. It was suggested that with the rapid spread of a new infectious disease, confusion will likely occur in the field, and having specific instructions will affect the Seikatsu-shien coordinators' activities.

6.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr ; 102: 104756, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1894795

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, informal caregivers' mental health deteriorated more than that of non-caregivers. We examined the association between increased caregiver burden during the pandemic and severe psychological distress (SPD). METHODS: We used cross-sectional data from a nationwide internet survey conducted between August and September 2020 in Japan. Of 25,482 participants aged 15-79 years, 1,920 informal caregivers were included. SPD was defined as Kessler 6 Scale (K6) score ≥ 13. Self-rated change in caregiver burden was measured retrospectively with a single question item. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association between SPD and increased caregiver burden during the pandemic, adjusted for demographic, socioeconomic, health, and caregiving variables. To examine the differential association between increased caregiver burden and SPD, interaction terms were added and binary logistic regression was separately conducted for all variables. RESULTS: Participants' mean age was 52.3 years (standard deviation 15.9), 48.8% of participants were male, 56.7% reported increased caregiver burden, and 19.3% exhibited SPD. Increased caregiver burden was significantly associated with SPD (adjusted odds ratio: 1.90; 95% confidence interval: 1.37-2.66). The association between increased caregiver burden and SPD was stronger among caregivers who were married, those undergoing disease treatment, and those with a care-receiver with a care need level of 1-2. CONCLUSIONS: The results revealed that more than half of caregivers reported increased caregiver burden, and increased caregiver burden was associated with SPD during the pandemic. Measures supporting mental health for caregivers with increased caregiver burden should be implemented immediately.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Psychological Distress , COVID-19/epidemiology , Caregiver Burden/epidemiology , Caregivers/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Pandemics , Quality of Life/psychology , Retrospective Studies
7.
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi ; 69(4): 284-296, 2022 Apr 26.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1716148

ABSTRACT

Objective Although volunteer activities of providing meals have been conducted as measures to prevent isolation and loneliness and to secure meals, evidence is lacking regarding how to implement such activities. In this study, we describe the activities process at a community cafeteria located within a housing complex and operated by resident volunteers during the COVID-19 pandemic to provide inexpensive meals. We also report the preliminary results of the impact of such activities on the residents.Method This case study was conducted at the community cafeteria Tate Kitchen 'Sakura' located within a Tokyo housing complex with a high ageing population. We collected data on the cafeteria activities during February to May, 2020. The data sources were daily activity records of the cafeteria, dialogues between volunteers and residents, and photos of activities. We qualitatively assessed the effects of the activities on the residents by classifying interviews with ten users and six volunteer staff based on the Kawakita Jiro (KJ) method.Results During the observation period, regular meetings were held among board members and volunteers, and operations of the cafeteria were verified and modified by referring to the COVID-19 prevention guide for citizens, advice from health professionals, and residents' opinions. It was determined that activities would continue without cessation; the cafeteria, managed mainly by volunteers under the food hygiene control system required for commercial restaurants, was open five days a week to maintain food security and ensure the health of the residents. The number of meals sold at the cafeteria was halved in May (n = 2,149) as a result of the modification in operations. However, the number of meals delivered to each household increased from March because of increased demand. Qualitative analyses using KJ method showed that users perceived that these continued activities were effective in securing food, maintaining social interaction and promoting health, and health promotion, while volunteers perceived that the activities were effective in promoting social interaction and health.Conclusion The resident volunteers continually confirmed their commitment to the principle of protecting food security and health within the community. They continued to operate the cafeteria by referring to available information on COVID-19 preventive measures, adopting the COVID-19 preventive measures, and involving all stakeholders. Qualitative analyses suggested that these continued efforts were useful for securing food and supporting health of the residents, looking after one other, and maintaining ties among residents.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/prevention & control , Humans , Meals , Pandemics/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Volunteers
8.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 19(4)2022 02 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1715313

ABSTRACT

This study aims to identify the independent influence of face-to-face contact (FFC) and non-face-to-face contact (NFFC) on the subsequent decline in self-rated health and mental health status by age. A total of 12,000 participants were randomly selected among residents in the study area, and 1751 of them responded to both the 2016 and 2018 mail surveys. The participants were subsequently classified into three age groups (25-49: Young adults; 50-64: Mid-aged adults; and 65-84: Older adults). Social contact was assessed by computing the frequencies of FFC and NFFC. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed the risk of social contact on the decline in self-rated health and World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index. Both FFC and NFFC were significantly associated with maintaining mental health; however, the impacts of FFC on mental health were more significant than that of NFFC among older adults and young adults. Compared with the no contact group, FFC was significantly associated with maintaining self-rated health in mid-aged adults. The influence of FFC and NFFC on health differed by age group.


Subject(s)
Health Status , Interpersonal Relations , Mental Health , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires
9.
Innovation in Aging ; 5(Supplement_1):744-745, 2021.
Article in English | PMC | ID: covidwho-1584366

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is assumed to have increased the number of socially isolated older adults. Public health researchers and policymakers are concerned about the deleterious effects of social isolation on individuals’ health. However, there is only limited evidence on the prevalence of social isolation. This study investigated the change in prevalence of social isolation caused by the spread of COVID-19 and examined various associated factors. Accordingly, data from the JACSIS study, a nationwide cross-sectional web-based questionnaire survey (N=28,000, age: 15–79 years) conducted in August–September 2020 (during the pandemic) were analyzed. The respondents who contacted family members, friends, or neighbors less than once a week were considered socially isolated. We examined individuals’ frequencies of contact, including meeting in person, e-mail/text message, voice call, and video call, in January (before the pandemic;recall question) and August 2020. The weighted prevalence values of social isolation were 26.8% (26.0%–27.5%) in men and 15.8% (15.1%–16.4%) in women before the pandemic and increased to 34.4% (33.6%–35.2%) and 21.4% (20.7%–22.1%), respectively, during the pandemic. Further, compared to the younger age group, the increase in prevalence during the pandemic was greater for the older age group for both genders. Multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed that those who came to be socially isolated during the pandemic possessed a greater fear of COVID-19 than those who were not continuously socially isolated. These findings suggest the necessity of developing immediate measures for social isolation and risk communication regarding COVID-19.

11.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 18(20)2021 10 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1477946

ABSTRACT

Social contextual factors could determine mortality by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), with social capital as a potential determinant. This study aimed to examine the association between prefecture-level social capital and COVID-19 deaths in Japan. Data on the cumulative number of COVID-19 deaths per 100,000 individuals between 1 October 2020 and 30 June 2021 in 47 prefectures were obtained from the government open-access database. Prefecture-level social capital was collected from a large-scale web-based nationwide survey conducted between August and September 2020. We included trust in neighbors, norm of reciprocity in the neighborhood, and trust in the national government as cognitive social capital, and neighborhood ties and social participation as structural social capital. The cumulative COVID-19 deaths per 100,000 individuals (1 October 2020 to 30 June 2021) ranged from 0.15 to 27.98 in 47 prefectures. A multiple regression analysis after adjusting for covariates showed that a greater norm of reciprocity and government trust were associated with fewer COVID-19 deaths during the first and second 3-month periods of observation. In the third 3-month period, the association between COVID-19 deaths and government trust became nonsignificant. Trust in neighbors, neighborhood ties, and social participation were not related to COVID-19 deaths during any time period. The disparity of COVID-19 deaths by prefecture in Japan can be explained by cognitive social capital. This study suggests that the association between social capital and COVID-19 deaths may vary according to the dimension of social capital and time period.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Social Capital , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Residence Characteristics , SARS-CoV-2 , Social Support , Trust
12.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 18643, 2021 09 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1428896

ABSTRACT

The aim of cross-sectional study was to investigate the association between loneliness, increased social isolation, and pain following the COVID-19 outbreak. A total of 25,482 participants, aged 15-79 years, were assessed using an internet survey; the University of California, Los Angeles Loneliness Scale (Version 3), Short Form 3-item (UCLA-LS3-SF3) was used to assess loneliness, and a modified item of the UCLA-LS3-SF3 was used to measure the perception of increased social isolation during the pandemic. The outcome measures included the prevalence/incidence of pain (i.e., headache, neck or shoulder pain, upper limb pain, low back pain, and leg pain), pain intensity, and the prevalence of past/present chronic pain. Pain intensity was measured by the pain/discomfort item of the 5-level version of the EuroQol 5 Dimension scale. Odds ratios of pain prevalence/incidence and past/present chronic pain prevalence according to the UCLA-LS3-SF3 scoring groups (tertiles) and the frequency of the perceived increase in social isolation (categories 1-5) were calculated using multinomial logistic regression analysis. The mean pain intensity values among different loneliness and social isolation levels were tested using an analysis of covariance. Increased loneliness and the severity of the perceived social isolation were positively associated with the prevalence/incidence of pain, pain intensity, and the prevalence of past/present chronic pain.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Disease Outbreaks , Internet , Loneliness , Pain/psychology , Social Isolation , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Chronic Pain/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Pain/epidemiology , Prevalence , Young Adult
13.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr ; 98: 104531, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1415201

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a widespread significant impact on mental health. However, the effect of providing care to family members (informal caregiving) on changes in mental health status during the pandemic remains unclear. METHODS: Using cross-sectional data from a large internet survey conducted between August and September 2020, we investigated the association of informal caregiving status with the incidence of mental health deterioration (increased loneliness, self-reported deterioration in mental health, and new suicidal ideation) in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: Among 25,482 participants (mean age 48.8 [standard deviation 17.3]; 50.3% women), 2,500 (9.8%) were providing informal care during the pandemic. After adjusting for potential confounders, informal caregivers were more likely than non-caregivers to experience increased loneliness (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.16; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.70-2.76), self-reported deterioration in mental health (aOR 1.54; 95% CI 1.14-2.08), and new incidence of suicidal ideation (aOR 3.65; 95% CI 1.92-6.92). The degree of mental health deterioration depended on the intensity of care. For example, the incidence rates of new suicidal ideation were 15.0%, 5.2%, and 3.6% for individuals who provided high-intensity caregiving, those who provided low-intensity caregiving, and non-caregivers, respectively (p-for-trend<0.001). The stratified analysis by gender showed that informal caregiving was associated with self-reported deterioration in mental health status among women (aOR 2.19; 95% CI 1.49-3.21) but not men (aOR 1.08; 95% CI 0.75-1.56). CONCLUSION: Informal caregivers were more likely to experience mental health deterioration than non-caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Caregivers , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Status , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
14.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 18(16)2021 08 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1341679

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is assumed to have caused an increase in the number of socially isolated people. However, the prevalence of social isolation during the pandemic has not been well studied, particularly among Asian populations. This study investigated changes in the prevalence of social isolation caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and examined its association with mental health among the general Japanese population. Data were obtained from a large-scale, web-based nationwide survey conducted from August to September 2020 (n = 28,000; aged 15-79 years). Social isolation was defined as less frequent contact with people other than co-residing family members. We assessed the participants' frequency of contact in January (before the pandemic) and August 2020 (during the pandemic). Mental health outcomes included psychological distress, suicidal ideation, loneliness, and fear of COVID-19. We analyzed the data of 25,482 respondents. The weighted prevalence (95% confidence interval) of social isolation was 21.2% (20.7-21.7%) and 27.9% (27.3-28.4%) before and during the pandemic, respectively. The prevalence of social isolation increased by 6.7 (6.3-7.0) percentage points during the pandemic. Older people and men had the greatest increase in the prevalence of social isolation. People who became socially isolated during the pandemic had greater loneliness and fear of COVID-19 than those who were consistently not socially isolated since before the pandemic. This study suggested that social isolation had increased during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan. Our findings highlight the importance of developing immediate measures against social isolation to maintain good mental health.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mental Health , Pandemics , Social Isolation , Aged , COVID-19/psychology , Female , Humans , Japan , Male
15.
J Affect Disord ; 287: 89-95, 2021 05 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1152456

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recent studies indicate an urgent need to take action against mental health issues during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the association between larger-scale environmental factors such as living conditions and mental health problems during the pandemic is currently unknown. METHODS: A nationwide, cross-sectional internet survey was conducted in Japan between August and September 2020 to examine the association between urbanization level and neighborhood deprivation as living conditions and COVID-19 case numbers by prefecture. Prevalence ratios (PRs) for severe psychological distress, suicidal ideation, and new-onset suicidal ideation during the pandemic were adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: Among 24,819 responses analyzed, the prevalence of mental health problems was 9.2% for severe psychological distress and 3.6% for new-onset suicidal ideation. PRs for severe psychological distress were significantly associated with higher urbanization level (highest PR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.08-1.56). PRs for new-onset suicidal ideation were significantly associated with higher urbanization level (highest PR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.37-2.45) and greater neighborhood deprivation (highest PR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.06-1.72). Severe psychological distress and new-onset suicidal ideation were significantly more prevalent when there was higher urbanization plus lower neighborhood deprivation (PR = 1.34 [1.15-1.56], and 1.57 [1.22-2.03], respectively). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that it is not the number of COVID-19 cases by residence area but higher urbanization level and greater neighborhood deprivation (lower neighborhood-level socioeconomic status) that are associated with severe psychological distress and new-onset suicidal ideation during the pandemic. These findings differ in part from evidence obtained before the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Psychological Distress , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Pandemics , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Suicidal Ideation , Urbanization
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL